Examples of Negligent Security that Lead to Serious Injury

Examples of Negligent Security that Lead to Personal Injury or Wrongful Death

Negligent Security Defined

Negligent security cases occur when a property owner fails in their legal duty to protect patrons, guests or residents from a violent, criminal act that was reasonably foreseeable.

Negligent security claims can be filed against the perpetrator of the violent crime (if they have sufficient assets to make a case worthwhile). However, negligent security claims are more commonly filed against third-party property owners, managers, and security companies because they bear responsibility for the injury suffered by the individual.

If you believe that you or your family member was seriously injured due to poor security, contact our Atlanta Negligent Security Attorneys immediately. We will conduct a comprehensive review of your personal injury claim and determine what steps you need to take to protect your legal rights and your ability to recover compensation.

Common Examples of Negligent Security

Negligent security comes in a wide array of different forms.  Some of the most common examples of negligent security that we see include:

Negligent hiring or training

Companies have a duty to conduct proper background checks on employees. If you or your loved one was severely injured by an employee, whether in an assisted living facility, daycare center, school, or at any other business, then the employer may be held liable by way of a third-party civil suit.

Inadequate employee supervision

In addition to putting in strong hiring procedures, companies and other employers must also proactively supervise all representatives. Dangerous misconduct cannot be allowed to occur or persist.

Lack of trained security personnel

If you were attacked because there were no security personnel on site, or because there was an insufficient number of trained security officers, then you may have a viable premises liability claim.

Inadequate screening at entrances

Property owners and occupiers are required to put in adequate screening measures at all entrances. Some doors should be locked from the outside; others may require people to log in their information, or that they pass through screening by a security officer.

Broken windows or locks

Unfortunately, criminal attacks sometimes happen because of windows or locks that were left negligently un-repaired by property owners or businesses. This is most frequently an issue in cases involving attacks at hotels, motels, and apartment buildings.

Insufficient lighting

Adequate lighting can do a lot to deter criminal activity. If you sustained a serious personal injury because of an attack that occurred in dangerously dark conditions at an Atlanta property, then we suggest you consult with an attorney immediately.

Common Injuries that Result from Negligent Security

Examples of violent crimes that could spur a Georgia negligent security lawsuit include:

Five Examples of Real-Life Inadequate Security Cases

Some real-life examples of negligent security lawsuits worth exploring to illustrate whether you may have a case include:

Restaurant Owner Fails to Upgrade Security

A restaurant owner in an area known for rampant crime does not hire armed security or even have a working surveillance camera. This may be especially true in cases where the restaurant is open 24-7. The owner of a breakfast chain was ordered to pay $900,000 after an armed robbery left plaintiff with facial fractures and a brain injury. The restaurant tried to argue that the patron was negligent for not simply handing the robber what he wanted. The trial court disagreed, and the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed the verdict.

Nightclub Fight Results in Patron Being Run Over by Truck

A fight at a nightclub escalates and grows violent in a parking lot, when one of those involved runs over another in a pickup truck. That’s what happened in a 1991 case. The Georgia Court of Appeals later affirmed. The person injured sued, arguing the nightclub was negligent in not having a security guard outside as patrons existed, and that the attacker’s act of running over another patron wasn’t an isolated criminal act, but a fight that started in the parking lot and escalated. It was true no one had been run over on the site before, but this was an extension of a chain of events stemming from an uninterrupted fight. Plus, as the appellate court noted, “There was evidence that prior fights had occurred both inside and outside appellant’s club, and it is certainly foreseeable that any fight which continues unchecked ad without interruption could escalate into a more violent encounter as emotions intensify.”

Amusement Park Held Liable for Gang Attack Outside Park

A gang violently attacks a man waiting at a bus stop outside the entrance of an amusement park. The victim was awarded $35 million by a Cobb County jury – later affirmed by the Georgia Supreme Court.  The park is located in an area that was known for crime and gang activity. That day inside the park, a group of attackers were harassing young families in the park. Security did not make them leave. They followed one of the men they were harassing out of the park to a nearby bus stop. There, he was beaten so badly he went into a coma and suffered permanent brain damage.

Grocery Store’s Parking Lot Security Deemed Inadequate in Customer Shooting

A Navy veteran was shot in a violent robbery in a grocery store parking lot, leaving him paralyzed. In 2019 a jury in DeKalb County awarded the veteran $81 million. Plaintiff’s attorneys argued the store was aware that the location was unsafe and high crime. One of the gunmen was reported to have been hanging out on in the parking lot on previous occasions. Yet the store failed to install any security guards in the parking lot. The store had hired a security firm prior to the shooting, but by contract, they were only responsible for interior security. They were initially named as a defendant but later dismissed from the case. The assailants were deemed 14 percent liable, so the final verdict against the grocery store was nearly $70 million.

Hotel Negligent in Parking Lot Robbery Shooting

A hotel guest was shot in an attempted robbery in the parking lot of an Atlanta hotel. A security guard at a Days Inn watched the entire incident from his vehicle 40 feet away and instructed the front desk to call the police. The hotel insisted it wasn’t liable for the plaintiff’s injuries because it was the result of unforeseeable conduct by a third-party. Specifically, although property crimes had been committed on-site before, none were substantially similar to an armed robbery that would put the hotel on notice something like this would happen. The trial court granted the hotel summary judgment, but the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, noting the 82 crimes reportedly committed in the hotel parking lot in the three years prior to the attack on the plaintiff. There was also one robbery in a guest room. Plaintiff also showed evidence from three other hotels within a quarter-mile radius – and the crimes committed in the parking lots of those locations were even more staggering, including robberies, a rape, assaults, and kidnapping. The plaintiff, from out-of-town, knew none of this. Meanwhile, the hotel had a policy that such statistics were supposed to be monitored and action taken accordingly. The trial court later decided in favor of the plaintiff, a verdict that was ultimately affirmed by the Georgia Supreme Court.

If you are injured as a result of inadequate security, our Atlanta injury lawyers can help.

The foregoing answers are not legal advice and are merely a general overview. You are advised to consult a lawyer to address your specific situation regarding your situation. For more information or to inquire about a free consultation, contact Stephen D. Apolinsky, an experienced Atlanta sexual assault victim attorney, at Apolinsky & Associates at (404) 377-9191 or email him at steve@aa-legal.com.


About the Author

Stephen Apolinsky

Stephen D. Apolinsky is a Personal Injury Attorney who specializes in representing individuals and families concerning wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. Stephen is licensed to practice in Georgia, Alabama, and the District of Columbia. With over 33 years of experience representing personal injury victims, Stephen has successfully tried over 80 cases to verdict before judges or juries, and has negotiated over 300 cases to out-of-court settlements. Stephen has been recognized as a Georgia Super Lawyer, and as a Top 100 Trial Lawyer by the National Trial Lawyers Association.